# Encore vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Encore | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 12 649 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +164 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.58.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Encore scores 72/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Encore ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

Encore is growing faster right now (+164 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Encore](https://selfhost.directory/project/encore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/encore.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/encore-vs-scada-lts