# EMQX vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EMQX | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 16 868 | 38 962 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +1 396 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Erlang | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 78/100 for EMQX, so it is the safer default.

EMQX ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EMQX](https://selfhost.directory/project/emqx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/emqx.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/emqx-vs-searxng