EMQXvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EMQX | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 16 868 | 92 975 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +58 034 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 35 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Erlang | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 78/100 for EMQX, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for EMQX.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).
EMQX details →OmniVoice-Studio details →