# EMQX vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EMQX | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 16 868 ✓ | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 ✓ | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Erlang | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

EMQX scores 78/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

EMQX ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.

## Details

- [EMQX](https://selfhost.directory/project/emqx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/emqx.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/emqx-vs-octoprint