# EMQX vs NATS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EMQX | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #2 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 16 867 | 20 953 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +191 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Erlang | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

NATS scores 80/100 against 78/100 for EMQX, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for EMQX.

If you want the quickest setup, NATS is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.

## Details

- [EMQX](https://selfhost.directory/project/emqx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/emqx.md)
- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/emqx-vs-nats