ElementvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Element | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Instant Messaging | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 13 621 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +119 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Element scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
Element ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Element needs more configuration.
Element is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
Element details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Element, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with