elasticsearchvsUglyFeed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | UglyFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 78 427 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 1 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 84/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.
If you want the quickest setup, UglyFeed is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →UglyFeed details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep UglyFeed, compare it with