elasticsearchvsglobalping-probe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | globalping-probe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 78 429 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +460 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 19 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | ISC |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 83/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for globalping-probe.
If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+460 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →globalping-probe details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep globalping-probe, compare it with