# eLabFTW vs Local Deep Research

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | eLabFTW | Local Deep Research |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Research | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 1 467 | 9 434 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +311 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 24 |
| Latest release | 5.6.15 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Local Deep Research scores 74/100 against 65/100 for eLabFTW, so it is the safer default.

eLabFTW ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 24 for Local Deep Research.

If you want the quickest setup, Local Deep Research is easier to run; eLabFTW needs more configuration.

Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [eLabFTW](https://selfhost.directory/project/elabftw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/elabftw.md)
- [Local Deep Research](https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/elabftw-vs-local-deep-research