# EGroupware vs Zulip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EGroupware | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 301 | 26 133 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +190 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 23.1.20261021 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 12.3 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zulip scores 82/100 against 53/100 for EGroupware, so it is the safer default.

EGroupware ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Zulip.

If you want the quickest setup, Zulip is easier to run; EGroupware needs more configuration.

Zulip is growing faster right now (+190 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EGroupware](https://selfhost.directory/project/egroupware) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/egroupware.md)
- [Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/project/zulip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zulip.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/egroupware-vs-zulip