# EGroupware vs Project N.O.M.A.D.

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EGroupware | Project N.O.M.A.D. |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 301 | 41 150 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 936 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | 23.1.20261021 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 53/100 for EGroupware, so it is the safer default.

EGroupware ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..

If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; EGroupware needs more configuration.

Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 936 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EGroupware](https://selfhost.directory/project/egroupware) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/egroupware.md)
- [Project N.O.M.A.D.](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/egroupware-vs-project-n-o-m-a-d