# EdenText vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted [Document Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/document-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EdenText | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 560 | 95 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 49/100 for EdenText, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for EdenText.

If you want the quickest setup, EdenText is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EdenText](https://selfhost.directory/project/edentext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/edentext.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/edentext-vs-stirling-pdf