# EdenText vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted [Document Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/document-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EdenText | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 560 | 45 002 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 49/100 for EdenText, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for EdenText.

If you want the quickest setup, EdenText is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EdenText](https://selfhost.directory/project/edentext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/edentext.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/edentext-vs-reactive-resume