# EDA vs Superset

> Two self-hosted [Business Intelligence projects](https://selfhost.directory/business-intelligence), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EDA | Superset |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 75 349 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +448 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | edalitics-3.1.1 · 25 Jun 2026 | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Superset scores 88/100 against 50/100 for EDA, so it is the safer default.

Superset ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for EDA.

If you want the quickest setup, EDA is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.

Superset is growing faster right now (+448 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EDA](https://selfhost.directory/project/eda) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/eda.md)
- [Superset](https://selfhost.directory/project/superset) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/superset.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/eda-vs-superset