# EDA vs Metabase

> Two self-hosted [Business Intelligence projects](https://selfhost.directory/business-intelligence), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EDA | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 49 904 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +506 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 30 ✓ |
| Latest release | edalitics-3.1.1 · 25 Jun 2026 | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 50/100 for EDA, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for EDA.

If you want the quickest setup, EDA is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EDA](https://selfhost.directory/project/eda) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/eda.md)
- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/eda-vs-metabase