# EcomGen vs Halo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | EcomGen | Halo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 10 in E-commerce | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 217 | 40 073 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +197 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 4 Oct 2026 | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Halo scores 79/100 against 42/100 for EcomGen, so it is the safer default.

Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for EcomGen.

If you want the quickest setup, Halo is easier to run; EcomGen needs more configuration.

Halo is growing faster right now (+197 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [EcomGen](https://selfhost.directory/project/ecomgen) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ecomgen.md)
- [Halo](https://selfhost.directory/project/halo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/halo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ecomgen-vs-halo