# e2b vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 14 603 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b and Zigbee2MQTT score the same (76/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

e2b is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-zigbee2mqtt