# e2b vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 14 605 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +647 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.

e2b is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-wyoming-piper