e2bvsWPS Office
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | WPS Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 14 607 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +649 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 21 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for WPS Office.
e2b is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →WPS Office details →