# e2b vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 14 593 ✓ | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +655 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+655 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-workout-cool