# e2b vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 14 593 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +655 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

e2b is growing faster right now (+655 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-woodpecker-ci