# e2b vs WireGuard Easy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | WireGuard Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 14 599 | 27 320 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +661 ✓ | +332 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 73/100 for WireGuard Easy, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [WireGuard Easy](https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-wireguard-easy