# e2b vs Winter CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Winter CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 597 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +659 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.

e2b is growing faster right now (+659 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Winter CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-winter-cms