e2bvswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 | 18 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | +288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 163 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.853.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
windmill scores 77/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 163 stable releases in the past year, against 76 for e2b.
e2b is growing faster right now (+658 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →windmill details →