# e2b vs web-check

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | web-check |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 14 593 | 35 280 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +655 ✓ | +373 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

web-check scores 81/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.

If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [web-check](https://selfhost.directory/project/web-check) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/web-check.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-web-check