e2bvsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 14 591 | 35 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +653 | +373 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 3 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b details →web-check details →