# e2b vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 ✓ | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 33 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+658 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-warpgate