# e2b vs Unison

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Unison |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 14 600 ✓ | 5 559 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +642 ✓ | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 65/100 for Unison, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.

e2b is growing faster right now (+642 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Unison](https://selfhost.directory/project/unison) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unison.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-unison