e2bvsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 14 595 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 0 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 68/100 for Tryton, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tryton.
If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+657 stars in 30 days).