# e2b vs trusted-cgi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | trusted-cgi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 14 593 ✓ | 249 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +655 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.

If you want the quickest setup, trusted-cgi is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+655 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [trusted-cgi](https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-trusted-cgi