# e2b vs Tasmota

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Tasmota |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 14 585 | 24 937 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +647 ✓ | +165 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tasmota.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-tasmota