# e2b vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+658 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana