e2bvsApache SkyWalking
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | Apache SkyWalking | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 607 | 24 978 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +649 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 3 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
e2b and Apache SkyWalking score the same (76/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →Apache SkyWalking details →