# e2b vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 591 | 45 667 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +653 | +835 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for sentry.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-sentry