e2bvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 14 599 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +661 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 2 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
e2b is growing faster right now (+661 stars in 30 days).