# e2b vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 14 591 ✓ | 2 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +653 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-rsyslog