# e2b vs ResourceSpace

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | ResourceSpace |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 595 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.

e2b is growing faster right now (+657 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [ResourceSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-resourcespace