# e2b vs Pulumi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 14 591 | 25 826 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +653 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulumi scores 78/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.

e2b is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Pulumi](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-pulumi