e2bvsProxmoxMCP-Plus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | ProxmoxMCP-Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 14 591 | 624 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +653 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 20 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 54/100 for ProxmoxMCP-Plus, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for ProxmoxMCP-Plus.
e2b is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →ProxmoxMCP-Plus details →