# e2b vs Proxmox Kubernetes Engine

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 ✓ | 244 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+658 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-proxmox-kubernetes-engine