# e2b vs Postiz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Postiz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 18 in Social Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 599 | 39 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +661 | +3 714 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.25.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Postiz scores 85/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Postiz.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Postiz needs more configuration.

Postiz is growing faster right now (+3 714 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Postiz](https://selfhost.directory/project/postiz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/postiz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-postiz