# e2b vs PostgREST

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | PostgREST |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 14 605 | 27 734 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +647 ✓ | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Haskell |

## Which one should you pick?

PostgREST scores 79/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for PostgREST.

If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

e2b is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [PostgREST](https://selfhost.directory/project/postgrest) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/postgrest.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-postgrest