# e2b vs Plane

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 603 | 61 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 | +1 805 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Plane scores 86/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Plane.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Plane needs more configuration.

Plane is growing faster right now (+1 805 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Plane](https://selfhost.directory/project/plane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plane.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenProject vs Plane](https://selfhost.directory/compare/openproject-vs-plane)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-plane