# e2b vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 14 602 | 61 814 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +644 | +1 472 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 472 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-penpot