e2bvspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 14 602 | 61 814 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +644 | +1 472 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 12 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.
If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 472 stars in 30 days).