# e2b vs OpenWrt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | OpenWrt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 14 602 | 28 969 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +644 ✓ | +456 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [OpenWrt](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-openwrt