e2bvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 10 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
e2b details →OpenWrt details →