# e2b vs open-compute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | open-compute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 14 599 ✓ | 2 400 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +661 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

e2b scores 76/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for open-compute.

e2b is growing faster right now (+661 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [open-compute](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-open-compute