# e2b vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 14 603 | 82 352 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 | +3 336 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 336 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-omniroute