# e2b vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 14 599 | 65 374 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +661 ✓ | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

e2b is growing faster right now (+661 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-nocodb